Strangely, and significantly, the modern Pentecostal groups of this world do not even keep this biblically commanded day! It is clear that Paul spoke of the tongues of angels also as something beyond the Corinthians’ natural abilities, just like moving mountains. Some believe the utterances to be the “tongues of angels” (1 Corinthians 13:1). It is very silly… when you go to church and speak in tongues, it is senseless”. Philadelphia Church of God, All Rights Reserved. 1 3 Is the “Pentecost experience” being repeated today? While Christ was with His disciples in the flesh, He was their actual, physical “Comforter.” For about three and a half years, the Holy Spirit had been dwelling with the disciples in the person of Christ. The main Bible verses about this subject of tongues are contained in a few easily remembered sections of Scripture. The gift of God’s Spirit to the Gentiles did not come suddenly from heaven, as the sound of a mighty wind, appearing as cloven tongues of fire. READ ALSO: Another NPP MP challenges Anas' undercover investigations to legal test, Ghana Trends: How Anas Aremeyaw Anas Caused a Stir With Latest Investigation | Yen.com.gh, Yen.com.gh is building a platform where Ghanaians can share local news and own experiences with each other. To say that speaking in tongues is a harmless practice, and is all right for those who want to, is an unwise position when information to the contrary is evident. Paul warns against speaking in a language the audience doesn’t understand, saying that to do so would make one who is an unbeliever or unlearned think the believers were crazy. On this occasion, the Gentiles received the power of the Holy Spirit by the ceremony of baptism and the laying on of hands by an ordained minister—in the same manner God gives the Holy Spirit to His begotten saints today. 1 Corinthians 13:1 says that even if one has the power to speak in the “tongues of … angels,” he is spiritually worthless unless he has love. Some modern tongues-speakers quote Matthew 3:11, contending that glossolalia is evidence of the “baptism of the Spirit.” John the Baptist’s reference to the baptism of the Holy Spirit however, does not refer to tongues as some separate baptism in addition to one’s initial receipt of the Holy Spirit. These views are defensible. 1 Corinthians 12 contains various scattered statements about tongues, while chapter 14 records the Apostle Paul’s instructions about and limitations regarding tongues. 2. This is due to two linguistic challenges I have when speaking English. Speaking in tongues is not speaking a heavenly language. It also came with the appearance of divided tongues of fire! The problem with a whole church speaking in tongues at the same time is that it is not biblical. They understand that Satan the devil has been cast down to this Earth (Revelation 12:10). They are not ignorant of Satan’s devices (2 Corinthians 2:11; Ephesians 6:10-18), and are wise enough to discern that the “tongues” experience witnessed on the day of Pentecost, a.d. 31, is not being repeated today. Luke 24:49 and Acts 1:4 show us that they were instructed to wait (or “tarry,” as it states in the King James Version) in Jerusalem until the appointed time. Many Pentecostal groups claim that their religion is of God, and that the “latter rain” of the Holy Spirit is now falling on the souls of men. Some believe that “speaking in tongues”—i.e. But is the presence of “speaking in tongues”—or glossolalia, as it is termed technically—evidence of God’s Holy Spirit? Verse 31 says that tongues should be used one by one in turn—not at the same time in devilish confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33). Both imply that almost all ‘speaking in tongues’ that is happening today is nonsense. Talking in tongues is a streaming babble of nonsense syllables delivered with a curious calm authority, as if what the speaker were saying made incontrovertible sense, even though it … Praying In Tongues Does'nt Need Interpretation Cuz It's A Prayer.Speaking nonsense is not praying in tongues Jesus told them that after His death and ascension they would receive “another Comforter”—the gift of the Holy Spirit; and it would dwell within them even as it had been evident in Him. No real educating takes place. I Faked Speaking in Tongues . Tongues Speaking Is Utterly Nonsense – Mzbel Explains Why. I certainly haven’t. I'll let others who have experience with it share theirs, but the evidence is pretty clear that it's not a real language they're speaking and is entirely a product of the individual's mind. In verse 28, Paul lists the governmental offices of the church, including the ranks of apostle and prophet. The Plain Truth About ‘Speaking in Tongues’. Far from being nonsense, when we pray in tongues we are actually declaring the wonders and mysteries and majesty of God. Then, beginning in verse 29, through a series of rhetorical questions, Paul decidedly proves that not all have the gift of tongues (or any of a number of other gifts for that matter). It is, instead, a reference to that very act of receiving God’s Spirit after repentance, which baptizes us into the true Church of God (1 Corinthians 12:13). Some groups view this experience as absolute proof one has the Spirit of God. This is the very opposite of certain Pentecostals, who give themselves over to tongues-speaking and are for a while controlled by the phenomenon, so much so that they may not remember or even know what they said “while under the influence”! Written By: Realest Blogger. One person admits that, like many others, after speaking in tongues, "I often did mouth nonsense syllables in an effort to start the flow of prayer-in-tongues" (Sherrill, p. 127); and such efforts, far from being discouraged, are actually advocated by Pentecostals. The following verses stress that the purpose of speaking in tongues is to edify and benefit the audience, not the speaker. It demands calm order in the service—all things being done “decently and in order” (1 Corinthians 14:40), in a godly manner and with proper decorum—which is the very opposite of the emotionally charged atmosphere of a tarry meeting. Is the ability to “speak in tongues” proof that one has the gift of the Holy Spirit? The “law” and “the testimony” are the Old and New Testaments—the Bible! Despite claims to the contrary, people today are not seen to speak miraculously in languages they did not learn through formal instruction. (Acts 2:2-4, 8, 11). Verses 10-17 stress the need for the audience to understand the words, and thus make plain that the words should be capable of being understood. From the beginning, Satan, the god of this world (2 Corinthians 4:4), has blinded most of mankind to God’s truth. The apostle James writes in his letter that the tongue of a person is set aflame by the fire of the demonic underworld (=Gehenna). It wouldn’t make sense for a minister of God to speak Spanish to an audience if they didn’t understand the Spanish language! Verse 32 states that the one who speaks in tongues is in control of his faculties at all times. Evidently the gift of tongues was given for the same reasons as other miraculous manifestations in early Church history. The listeners marveled because Peter, to their ears, seemed to be speaking in their native, local dialects, although he obviously hadn’t learned all these languages by going to school or through some other normal method of study. He did not work up the crowd with rhythmically chanted, vain repetitions (Matthew 6:7). Paul is clearly writing of common human languages of the day. Chapter 14 of 1 Corinthians is devoted entirely to the tongues topic. Paul referred to it as one of God’s gifts in 1 Corinthians 12, right along with the gifts of faith and healing. Twitter. Muslims may very well speak nonsense, but it's in a recognizable language. The gift of speaking in tongues is a spiritual gift. Women preachers are sinful, and are a major reason for all the doctrines of devils being taught in pulpits today across America. Verse 1 encourages normal, inspired preaching over the gift of tongues. A multitude of Jews, amazed, came hurrying to the place. The late Herbert W. Armstrong made it plain that “the gift of ‘tongues’ spoken of in the Bible is the ability to speak of God in other languages—languages that are foreign and previously unknown to the speaker” (Tomorrow’s World, February 1972). The new religious movement soon spread across the country and even overseas. There is clear Scriptural evidence condemning the mumbo-jumbo, nonsense, which Charismatics call “speaking in tongues” today. One is vocal only; the other is linked with wild physical movement and uncontrolled shouts. Beliefs differ, too, as to whether the utterances mean anything in any language. Those of the Parthian dialect heard the disciples, all of them, speak the Parthian language. Speaking in tongues: Is it a legitimate religious "experience" or someone just rambling incoherent nonsense Also assembled in Jerusalem on that special holy day, besides the disciples, were other devout men—Jews from all over the Roman Empire. How could that possibly be a bad thing? And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. Speaking In Tongues 2. One of the "Tenets" of the Pentecostal movement is the belief in the infilling of the "Holy Spirit" with the evidence of "Speaking in Tongues" or an "Unknown Tongue". The vocal singer has taken it a step further, describing speaking in tongues as utter nonsense. The devil has led many astray through counterfeit spiritual experiences. Some believe that “speaking in tongues”—i.e. (1972). Such is not the case today as many “tongues-speakers” are women. It has come to be seen as nothing more than meaningless nonsense syllables strung together, but allegedly it once was much more divine. In other words, the gift of tongues is the God-given, miraculous ability to speak in a human language that one has not learned in any normal manner. The remaining verses clear up any modern misunderstandings on this question. Verse 23 makes the same point a different way. Suddenly, the Holy Spirit arrived with a great display of power! God’s word is the standard by which we should judge all things (John 17:17). But true Christians are told to “believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1). God’s “very elect” Philadelphian Christians are not naive or gullible, nor can they be deceived (Matthew 24:24). That is why people so often speak negatively and destructive. The National Democratic Congress (NDC), loyalist has taken it a step further, describing speaking in tongues as utter nonsense. But it is certainly not those demonstrations of emotional and indecipherable gibberish that some religious groups today call “speaking in tongues.”. Glossolalia, or speaking in tongues, is one of those shadowy terms that we have all heard, but the act itself is something that we have probably not heard.